Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points @ 2xAA GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz Windows 7 64-bit build 760 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. The max. AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 740 Processor We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. Temp at 100% 66c SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) Window mode: fullscreen GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Dynamic background Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW 4gb DDR3 ram. 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Is that bad if so what could be causing this? system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) But this is my first pascal card. AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Testing furmark … Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz But you should see a good difference I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. Overclock it? ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points Who’s laughing now. Frames 2250 crap monitor x.x) 72 degrees C But can in 720. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1201) FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Temperature was 78°. 1080p Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. But this is my first pascal card. Uhren: GPU: 1188 MHz, Speicher: 3004 MHz I suggest you do the same if you want a direct comparison. CPU Speed 2395 MHz amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings ASUS P8Z77-VLK The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. so whats’ wrong? FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … Resolution: 1920 x 1080 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) Max GPU Temp: 90°C Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. PC Specification: Preset:1080 1830 MHz/1535 MB Average 36fps. 3900 MHz/16337 MB FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). Sabertooth 990FX Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. Results: FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:35 points (0 FPS, 60000 ms) max fps in full HD: ~43 Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080, GTX 680 (stock cooling) @ Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) well check the 4th line: I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 Saphire 7870 got me a 3354 on the Burn in benchmark. GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz Discussion. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Sounds quite low to me . No AA this time This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. 9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. Too hot? – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. – Radeon RX 5500 XT Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). GPU clock: 1050 MHz A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C ... 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score. Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam Preset:1080 Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. GPU mem: 1300MHz AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Max GPU Temp: 80°C MSAA samples: 0 i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz – GeForce GTX TITAN Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz RAM: 16383 MB 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. MSAA samples: 0 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz @ 1920×1080 Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) That would mean I’m beating a 680! From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545. I got an intel core i5 4460 3,2GHz, asrock h97 anniversary mobo, 240gb samsung evo 850 ssd (Win10 inside), gtx 1070 palit 8GB, hyperx ddr3 8 gb RAM, 1TB HDD. Oops, my bad. Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C Why is there no 6850 listed? I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. Graphics drivers: 9.18.13.2018 5-12-2013 – GLnvoglv64 I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 ??? clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 I get a failure when I try to Submit results. The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. Can’t wait to get another one of these suckers and crossfire them but until then, Witcher 2 is pretty pleased with this overclock totally maxed even ubersampling, I tried to benchmark 9800GTX at 720p with no AA and GPU crashed after like 15 seconds. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings GPU core: 950MHz 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798) How about TimeSpy? FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. 2 different tests on 15 min burn. It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz , 6569 points (72 FPS) with two MSI GTX 670’s. I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. Th… Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms) FYI temperature 57°C. score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C Preset:1080 The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. 2046 MB Windows XP 32 Bit The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … @ 1920×1080 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} FurMark 1.22.0.0 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) System Info FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) bench duration:15min GPU clock: 1019 MHz Update: 2017.12.12 GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 System Memory |2046MB That’s crazy, is that even possible? 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points , 3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good. Or passmark’s performance test 9? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz – Radeon RX 470, Update: 2014.11.10 Memory clock: 1500 MHz FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 Memory clock: 1500 MHz SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. – GeForce GTX TITAN Black GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* Preset:1080 GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 CPU Speed: 3510MHz first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Graphics score looks fine. SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset. Treiber: 9.18.13.2680 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. System Memory: 16330 MB Max GPU Temp: 0°C I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg – Radeon RX Vega 64. CPU: 4616 MHz Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562, 3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. MSI’s GTX 1050 Ti comes with three modes for the GPU clock speeds: Silent mode (base: 1290MHz, boost: 1392MHz), Gaming mode (base: 1303MHz, boost: 1417MHz) and OC mode(base: 1316MHz, boost: 1430MHz). score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) What are your thoughts? This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? 1000W OCZ-ZX1000W-UN ZX Gold 3125 MHz Might help. MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC CPU speed:4709 MHz Welcome to the Geekbench CUDA Benchmark Chart. MSAA samples: 0 This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Update drivers etc too. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit Window режим: полноэкранный Duration: 5min Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. FPS: min:22, max:23, avg:21 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, XFX Radeon HD 6850 Double D 63Deg C. I have a gt8500 and i scored {SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)} is that correct? Jerome, somethings wrong here. – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. GPU core: 1380MHz GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. – added Preset:2160 scores. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). CPU speed: 3499 MHz GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. I cant test under 1080. My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! Is it about what I should be expecting though? Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 Its not adding up. max temp: 79C Burn-in GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) Catalyst: 13.5 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. GeForce GTX 680/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1180) 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C Graphics drivers: SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. OS:Windows 7 64-bit, 2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. Catalyst 13.1 Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms). FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … 34°C Memory clock: 3004 MHz 7850 GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Tested more than twice. In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. Or Firestrike? ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) Memory clock: 3004 MHz GPU clock: 1050 MHz Furmark – 1920×1080 profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. System memory: 4094 MB ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. is that right? festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb Isnt that a little low for my rig? You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. hate it when i do that lol. While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! Its pretty strange. 13190 frames, 14 FPS Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) amd a4 5300 3.4ghz cpu, as stated the cpu is NOT overclocked and last reported running at 3.67, 3.37* as 3.67 would be clocked. I am registered. GeForce GTX 465 Min temp 60°C In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX Preset:1080 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. GPU clock: 1005 MHz Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. CPU: 3013 MHz My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor using msi afterburner. Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. Max GPU Temp: 80°C I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz 13FPS and 836 score. should mention OS win8 64 bit I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. Resolution: 1280 x 720 Core Clock—- 950(MHz) If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz) Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C System Info: Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C CPU speed: 3400 MHz This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series Fan: 75%. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) Hope this helps in some way. The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … system memory:8172 MB The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) Who’s laughing now. 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. BTW, am using v1.10.0. Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table.